Rubla Rhan
by Hunter
Wed Dec 05, 2007 at 08:51:26 PM PST
In grand New York, under Pale Male's wing
Where the subways hum, and taxis sing
There lived a man who liked his bling
And who would screw most anything.
With his wife he became bored
but yet his bald libido roared
So to the Hamptons he would soar
And charged his sex romps to the poor.
"Why not?" he cried,
"I deserve to roam, And smell the ocean's salty foam.
These funds may help the homeless, true,
But does not my d*ck need shelter too?"
Mere protocol would not deter,
the funds were easily transferred;
his mistress preened, her family purred,
and the city worked as their chauffeurs.
Courageously, he seized that day
(And other things along the way)
And his wife thought him a jerk
(And still the radios did not work.)
Still he was not happy, though:
He sought a quicker place to go,
A private place for a quick perk
Within walking distance from his work.
So a stately Terror Dome he built
On ground where previous blood was spilt
With a private room in which to snog
(And police to walk his girlfriend's dog.)
But one day thunder shook the ground;
The buildings fell, the skies profound
In tragedy, and yet in death unbound
Our Adonis soon would be renowned..
.
Our hero, grim, undaunted!
Look! See him rise through ash and soot!
As the city lifted voice in prayer
Rubla Rhan was quickly there.
Our hero knew, in smoke and din
That what was needed most was him
Look at him walk! He stood quite firm --
And tried to stay on past his term.
Yes, through tragedy and sordid spree
Our Romeo will always be
The inverse of a Kennedy Who asks:
What can my city do for me?
Still, there is just one more dream,
yet one more path, a greater gleam,
A place beyond the city lights
Where power peaks at lofty heights.
A place past agencies coerced,
Beyond cops and dogs and humps perverse,
And power over the city's purse
And radios, and bombs, and worse.
And so he dreams of his ascent
And thinks to himself alone, when spent,
How many more there are, content,
that I could screw as President.
_______________________________________
Dogs smarter than we think, study shows
James Randerson, science correspondent
Thursday December 6 2007
To the dog lover, the ability of man's best friend to bark at the postman and fetch a stick is proof of his intelligence. But they may be even brighter than that. Scientists have welcomed dogs into a select club of species capable of using abstract concepts. The research showed that dogs are able to mentally sort objects into categories, a talent for abstract thought that has only been shown in birds and primates before.
The researchers trained four dogs with a touch-screen test which involved choosing between two images which appeared simultaneously. One was an image of a dog, the other a landscape. The animals indicated their preference with a prod of their noses. When they chose the dog they were rewarded with food. If they chose the landscape they had to wait a few seconds before the same two images appeared again.
Next the team tested the dogs - two border collies, an australian shepherd and a mongrel - with an unfamiliar set of dog pictures and landscapes. To pass they would need to realise that "dog" is a category of object that unfamiliar objects also fall into. Their success dropped slightly from about 80% to 72%. "It shows us that dogs are able to use more or less abstract concepts," said Dr Friederike Range, who carried out the work with colleagues at the University of Vienna.
Lastly, the experimenters used familiar landscapes as background with new dog images superimposed. Again the animals were able to choose the ones with the dogs. The research appears in the journal Animal Cognition and is reported today in New Scientist magazine.
_______________________________________
Comment HuffIt -->
But now it appears as if having the knowledge to be able to build a nuclear bomb is enough to let slip the neocon jagoffs of war -- whether or not a nuclear weapon is actually being constructed. President Bush during Tuesday's press conference:
"Look, Iran was dangerous, Iran is dangerous and Iran will be dangerous if they have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment